[Bf-committers] VSE caching
bassam at urchn.org
Mon Mar 23 15:36:59 CET 2015
Does the sequence editor in it's current state do any caching during
If you're editing exr sequences it might really make sense to work with
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 12:05 +0100, Antony Riakiotakis wrote:
> Hmmm...it sounds like it's just way more expensive to process the
> files in this case since they are floats. Generally there are some
> non-obvious tricks to make the sequencer play back better such as
> disabling anti aliasing and making sure the target resolution is close
> to the footage resolution.
> On 23 March 2015 at 11:13, Thomas Volkmann <lists at thomasvolkmann.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I just wanted to ask if something is wrong with the way the seqence-editor uses
> > its cache.
> > Basically I have a 1920*1080 exr seqence that I can't get to playback at 25fps
> > although I have more than sufficient memory and I have set it in the prefs.
> > Playing back the same sequence as jpg is no problem at all.
> > Does Blenders VSE have a problem with caching exr files?
> > Here is the thread on StackExchange:
> > http://blender.stackexchange.com/questions/27402/vse-not-playing-in-realtime-not-caching
> > thx!
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bf-committers mailing list
> > Bf-committers at blender.org
> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
More information about the Bf-committers