[Bf-committers] Blender performance measuring instrumentation improvement proposal

Martijn Berger martijn.berger at gmail.com
Wed Jun 10 13:44:39 CEST 2015


Hi Sergey,

I agree that the overall timer + playback has limited use cases compared to
proper full instrumentation of all parts of blender.
But I don't really suggest it does.

What things would be good to be able to make this thing do in order to
extract better information?

Martijn

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Sergey Sharybin <sergey.vfx at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I didn't say it's difficult, i only mentioned that it is to be thought much
> more careful defining which exact information is useful for us and how to
> gather it.
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Campbell Barton <ideasman42 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Martijn, think its fine to have more comprehensive performance tests
> > (which can include extending, bpy.ops.wm.redraw_timer or add related
> > operators to give more comprehensive info).
> >
> > This seems like 2 separate projects,
> >
> > - ability to perform tests and collect feedback.
> > - extend existing performance tests.
> >
> > Second needs review of each kind of test added, but that can be done
> > on case-by-case basis, to see whats really useful to measure.
> >
> >
> > Ability to execute operators directly from command line is handy,
> > uploaded patch.
> > https://developer.blender.org/D1347
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bf-committers mailing list
> > Bf-committers at blender.org
> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
> >
>
>
>
> --
> With best regards, Sergey Sharybin
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>


More information about the Bf-committers mailing list