[Bf-committers] Blender performance measuring instrumentation improvement proposal

Antony Riakiotakis kalast at gmail.com
Wed Jun 10 13:41:10 CEST 2015


It would be nice to be able to separate this total performance time to
sub-costs, otherwise it would indeed difficult to make out something
out of that number apart from "performance changed" - which indeed
says little, performance changes with every change.

On 10 June 2015 at 13:38, Sergey Sharybin <sergey.vfx at gmail.com> wrote:
> I didn't say it's difficult, i only mentioned that it is to be thought much
> more careful defining which exact information is useful for us and how to
> gather it.
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Campbell Barton <ideasman42 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Martijn, think its fine to have more comprehensive performance tests
>> (which can include extending, bpy.ops.wm.redraw_timer or add related
>> operators to give more comprehensive info).
>>
>> This seems like 2 separate projects,
>>
>> - ability to perform tests and collect feedback.
>> - extend existing performance tests.
>>
>> Second needs review of each kind of test added, but that can be done
>> on case-by-case basis, to see whats really useful to measure.
>>
>>
>> Ability to execute operators directly from command line is handy,
>> uploaded patch.
>> https://developer.blender.org/D1347
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bf-committers mailing list
>> Bf-committers at blender.org
>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>>
>
>
>
> --
> With best regards, Sergey Sharybin
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers


More information about the Bf-committers mailing list