[Bf-committers] Revisions for 2.73a

Bastien Montagne montagne29 at wanadoo.fr
Mon Jan 19 11:49:48 CET 2015


Would add this one:

6e97db7b3000769c54b0cd7df6a7c93cf62fd9da

Not a regression, but safe and fix real stupid bug

Le 19/01/2015 11:32, Sergey Sharybin a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> There's list of revisions which are either marked by authors as candidates
> for 2.73a or which solves some bad issues and are safe one-liners:
>
> ae18fd5937753d1fc420dc8aef78efacabb9750c
> def2ef88b089b69b2f4e1884a916232101edc8ae
> e02af840e1fbafd068d527ade70146141ab16946 +
> 73955e256678c5873ee83d32f861d7f35b917d57 ?
> ca9bdf3f286a4c01eb2da1a5689b71737636f659
> dec523da877facb0573dccce6d95e5b0d2734707
> 599c8a2c8e4cf1f904c5422916ebfd8d12eebe69
> 1864253db06957ec344e6504b1c33e7f83cdaa99
> 9d02e2626bdec0b230cb71103822c773979c516e
> b77dd130044c43fd12a3ce4adf645ef88d871a50
> 3f0113be4ddb75e1e4dd159e58112e8c45ebdb12
> 653c6f2edd82bdb9b9c4f8357be1ae0ed528b824
> 1994e843d6bb144054356fc54e49f730e843e969
>
> I also included SDL changes since it might solve missing SDL support on
> some distros.
>
> Are there other revisions which developers thinks are crucial and safe for
> 'a'? or maybe you think some revisions should be excluded from the list.
>
> Capbell, i might have added some extra commits from you, those i'd like you
> to check :)
>



More information about the Bf-committers mailing list