[Bf-committers] MinGW buildbots

[Jeffrey H]

Sounds good to me! Good luck, Antony.

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Sergey Sharybin <sergey.vfx at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Ok, so think the plan then would be:
>
> - Jeffrey's builder goes to a deserved retirement (so Jeffrey can wipe the
> bloody windoze from his machines ;)
> - Antony finishes his work on updating environment for gcc-4.9
> - Once it's ready (no pressure in here, that's hell of annoying work) we
> deploy it to the same machine as msvc builds, so nobody's laptop is
> stressed with the load
>
> Sounds like a plan to everyone?
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Jeffrey H <italic.rendezvous at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Feel free to get rid of mine. My MinGW builder never successfully built.
> > JesterKing said he got his buildbot working locally, but I could never
> > recreate that. I could get my local builds working, but never buildbot's.
> >
> > I'm not running Windows these days because I discovered I could ditch it
> > entirely for my school work (and potentially for commercial work, too).
> > That being said, I still have a working partition of Windows 7 that I can
> > make into a builder again if I need to. Marijn's builders somewhat took
> > over and I was never needed once we switched over to MSVC2013 because
> > legacy 2008 was not supported by the project anymore.
> >
> > I am on winter break for another week and a half and won't have access to
> > my workstation till I get back, but if you have any requests, please let
> me
> > know.
> >
> > Also, thanks to the developers for the opportunity to build for you
> while I
> > could. It was certainly an experience and gave me a taste of your world
> > without actually learning a language.
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Sergey Sharybin <sergey.vfx at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > if it's matter of machine we can move buildbot to the same machine as
> > > official builder are. Which is quite simple for you :)
> > >
> > > But why do we have two mingw slaves? Can we leave only one?
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Antony Riakiotakis <kalast at gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Probably one of the slaves was my laptop but it's not idle enough to
> > > > act as buildslave.
> > > >
> > > > Side note - I am preparing an upgrade to a MinGW-w64/gcc/4.9.2
> > > > seh-posix based build for our supported platform.
> > > >
> > > > On 16 January 2015 at 00:02, Sergey Sharybin <sergey.vfx at gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > There are two mingw64 slaves which were online for quite some time
> > now
> > > > (at
> > > > > least few months).
> > > > >
> > > > > Are they gonna to be maintained or we can hide them and stop trying
> > to
> > > > > schedule builds on them?
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > With best regards, Sergey Sharybin
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Bf-committers mailing list
> > > > > Bf-committers at blender.org
> > > > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Bf-committers mailing list
> > > > Bf-committers at blender.org
> > > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > With best regards, Sergey Sharybin
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Bf-committers mailing list
> > > Bf-committers at blender.org
> > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bf-committers mailing list
> > Bf-committers at blender.org
> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
> >
>
>
>
> --
> With best regards, Sergey Sharybin
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>