[Bf-committers] Luminance patches
kalast at gmail.com
Tue Feb 17 23:05:41 CET 2015
Hi Thomas, agreed, I am also of the same opinion. It will hurt old
files slightly but better now than never.
On 17 February 2015 at 20:21, Thomas Beck <software at plasmasolutions.de> wrote:
> Hi Antony,
> I'm for "fix it properly by breaking old files slightly". I (the artists
> around me agree) prefer to let old files break (in terms of color
> correction) when we get a working color pipeline with correct formulas in
> exchange for it. I would really not like to see a wrong behavior carried on
> endless times just to be compatible to infinity and beyond ;) .
> Greetings, Thomas
> Design | Development | Training
> Website: Http://www.plasmasolutions.de <http://www.plasmasolutions.de/>
> Blog: Http://blog.plasmasolutions.de <http://blog.plasmasolutions.de/>
> Telefon: +49 176 2017 9565
> Blender Foundation Certified Trainer
> <http://www.blendernetwork.org/BFCT>Autor von "Blender 2.7 - das umfassende
> Handbuch" <http://www.galileo-press.de/3404>
> 2015-02-17 19:42 GMT+01:00 Antony Riakiotakis <kalast at gmail.com>:
>> We have quite a few functions to select luminance in our code.
>> Recently there were two patches to cleanup things.
>> Seeing how developers still use any of the two in the code and how
>> there's really one correct formula for this it might be good to make
>> some decision about this.
>> Choises are - either we change this and break old files slightly or we
>> keep it and we have wrong histograms, tools and compatibility with
>> color management pipeline.
>> I am curious about what coders and artists think about the change
>> since it will influence both.
>> Bf-committers mailing list
>> Bf-committers at blender.org
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
More information about the Bf-committers