[Bf-committers] GSoC 2014 Aspirant: Implementation of a Pyramid Primitive in Blender

[Eugene Minov]

yes, I agree. If by any chance it would be added, "Cone / Pyramid" would be
better option.


On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Harley Acheson <harley.acheson at gmail.com>wrote:

> > If it's a pyramid it should have it's own create method
>
> I don't agree...
>
> We could duplicate the current "cone" code, call it "pyramid", and restrict
> it to 3 or 4 sides only. But that would be incorrect because a pyramid can
> have any number of sides. So then "cone" and "pyramid" would be identical.
>  Hmmm... that's because they are basically the same things.
>
> We could rename our "cone" to "pyramid" or to "Cone / Pyramid" or people
> can just get used to the difference in terminology. But having two items in
> the list doing the same job with different names seems silly...
>
> Harley
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>