[Bf-committers] Node link swapping

[joe]

I agree, but I think maybe we should bring it back until the new
implementation. Though it shouldn't be too hard, just an extra flag per
node.
On Apr 14, 2014 3:56 PM, "Daniel Salazar - patazstudio.com" <
zanqdo at gmail.com> wrote:

> The old behavior was too broad and intrusive, maybe swapping could be
> implemented just in the few cases where it actually makes sense like
> in mix nodes
> Daniel Salazar
> patazstudio.com
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:53 PM, gandalf3 <zzyxpaw at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have missed the node connection usability feature which was removed in
> > r61178, and I'm convinced that my node workflow is slightly slower than
> > it was before.
> >
> > I have written up a wiki page/request explaining why I think the old
> > behavior was faster in most cases. You can find it here:
> >
> http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev_talk:Ref/Proposals/UI/Socket_Swapping
> >
> > And I just want to say how awesome Blender is, and also thanks, for
> > keeping Blender going :)
> >
> > --
> > -gandalf3
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bf-committers mailing list
> > Bf-committers at blender.org
> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>