[Bf-committers] I think this should be added

[Julian Hhhhhh]

This is just a really fancy way of saying that these points are at the same
distance to two of the edges of the image. Not more. I do believe that this
might be a good guide, but it's pretty trivial that it will often look good
to place important things in an image at the same distance to, for example,
the left and the top edge. The reason why I would not include that is
because that is something that is very easy to check without any crazy
lines. Positioning something at equal distance to two borders is something
most people are able to judge with their eyes. Very precisely.

Doesn't help that he cropped off the top of Mona Lisa, otherwise the line
goes through her nose.

Just my opinion on this.

Julian

2012/10/6 Nicholas Rishel <rishel.nick at gmail.com>

> But don't allow this assumption to prevent you from applying a scientific
> process to verify the disproof. There is knowledge in the ability to say
> that something is verifiability wrong if the hypothesis could be
> intuitively believed.
>
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Harley Acheson <harley.acheson at gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Take almost any image and bisect a broad diagonal stroke somewhere
> > near the center and the probability is quite high that it will intersect
> > something
> > interesting, especially when your definition of interesting is fuzzy.
> >
> > But for this game you are allowed to do it four times and then choose the
> > best one of the four.  Don't be surprised when what you select is
> pleasing
> > to you.  That is because you are aligning the guides to the image instead
> > of the image to the guides.
> >
> > Harley
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bf-committers mailing list
> > Bf-committers at blender.org
> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>