[Bf-committers] Collada importer/exporter kickout

Sergey Sharybin sergey.vfx at gmail.com
Fri Jan 6 12:49:10 CET 2012


Nope, it wouldn't be possible.

Collada is implemented in C, not in Py and so can't be used as
import/export addons.

On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Gaia Clary <gaia.clary at machinimatrix.org>wrote:

> Would it be an option to separate the current Collada implementation
> into an addon module, which is disabled by default, but can be enabled
> from the addon panel ? (with a text flagging it as "Experimental" for
> example)
>
> This would keep it out of view for everybody who does not need it.
> But people who actually work with the current Collada exporter
> could still enable it easily.
>
> -gaia-
>
>
> Am 06.01.2012 11:58, schrieb Ton Roosendaal:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think it's a bad precedence to create a tracker for every feature we
> notice is badly supporting or failing. Just moving reports to another
> tracker is not solving anything of course.
> >
> > I would rather tackle it more political&  practical:
> >
> > 1) Official announcement that Blender drops Collada support
> > 2) Move Collada support into a branch, out of trunk
> > 3) Create a tracker "orphanage" or "branches" or so, where we put all
> reports that are not in support (anymore).
> >
> > BTW:
> >
> > I've personally had it with Collada and its supporters. Next time we add
> this back in Blender it should be based on well defined and tested use
> cases, on a level we (or the branch team) can support it. In my opinion
> that's proven to be impossible, for reasons how Collada works, designed and
> has been organized.
> >
> > Three months ago already I wrote this open letter:
> > http://code.blender.org/index.php/2011/10/collada-momentum/
> >
> > -Ton-
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Ton Roosendaal  Blender Foundation   ton at blender.org    www.blender.org
> > Blender Institute   Entrepotdok 57A  1018AD Amsterdam   The Netherlands
> >
> > On 4 Jan, 2012, at 20:57, Sergey Sharybin wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> As everybody noticed current collada importer/exporter is very buggy
> which
> >> seems to make this format almost useless in Blender. And what's much
> worse
> >> -- we don't actually have developer who maintains this area.
> >>
> >> We discussed this already with Campbell and found that OpenCollada
> itself
> >> isn't actually maintaning -- there are only few commits in several
> months.
> >> Ofcourse it doesn't mean this library is useless and all bug from our
> >> tracker is related on that issues, but still.. Maybe the time have come
> to
> >> re-think this importer/exporter (investigate if it's possible to fix
> issues
> >> in clear way, check if design is good enough -- not sure, haven't
> touched
> >> this code deep myself)?
> >>
> >> Here's our proposal:
> >> - Move all collada-related issues into it's own tracker. Like it was
> done
> >> with BGE, it might help finding volunteer to fix them. Also, people will
> >> see that it's not actually core stuff and that it's community-supported.
> >> - Disable collada in release builds. It's not useable and only seems to
> be
> >> making artists disappointed.
> >>
> >> More optimistic targets would be find volunteer to pick up this stuff
> who
> >> will make it usable (maybe rewritting this stuff from scratch..)
> >>
> >> --
> >> With best regards, Sergey Sharybin
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Bf-committers mailing list
> >> Bf-committers at blender.org
> >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bf-committers mailing list
> > Bf-committers at blender.org
> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>



-- 
With best regards, Sergey Sharybin


More information about the Bf-committers mailing list