[Bf-committers] Tile Branche Merge

[Campbell Barton]

+1, skipping commits just gives bigger headaches later - especially if
done more then once it can become really horrible to track this down
later on.

On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Brecht Van Lommel
<brechtvanlommel at pandora.be> wrote:
> Changes from these commits should be merged over as soon as possible,
> otherwise they get lost. In my opinion, you should never skip commits
> in a merge really, unless they are no longer relevant, it's too hard
> to keep track of.
>
> Brecht.
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Thomas Dinges <blender at dingto.org> wrote:
>> For the record, due to file re-organisation, this merge is missing
>> changes to the compositor nodes from SVN 42814, 42928, 43004.
>>
>> Am 03.01.2012 05:26, schrieb Thomas Dinges:
>>> Hi Jeroen and others,
>>> I merged the Trunk changes from the past 2 months into the tile branch.
>>>
>>> Tested it with simple node setup, worked great. I resloved some issues
>>> in the merge, see commit message for details.
>>> SVN: 43092
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Dinges
>> Blender Developer, Artist and Musician
>>
>> www.dingto.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bf-committers mailing list
>> Bf-committers at blender.org
>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers



-- 
- Campbell