[Bf-committers] error compiling with cycles

[Brecht Van Lommel]

I agree here, I think it's more important to compile easily than to
require the configurations in svn to match the release exactly. We
don't really enforce this with cmake or on other platforms either.

Brecht.

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Harley Acheson
<harley.acheson at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Scons is used for release builds, so scons default config is configured
>> for releases == all enabled
>
>
> Yes, but it does seem odd that a default configuration will fail without a
> specific 3rd-party toolkit installed, a video card from a specific
> manufacturer
> with up-to-date-drivers.  I thought we were trying to make it *easier* to
> get it compiling...
>
> Can't Scons just test for BF_CYCLES_CUDA_NVCC being empty and
> treat it as if WITH_BF_CYCLES_CUDA_BINARIES is false?
>
>
> harley
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers