[Bf-committers] Roadmap for 2.5x - 2.6x - beyond

[Jonathan Smith]

Sorry.

I had not realized that this was already set until today. I had figured we
would be releasing 2.59 and then 2.60 and then working on new stuff, not
finishing with 2.58. If I had known that I would have started protesting
earlier. If we want to end with 2.58, then that's fine with me, I was just
hoping we could make it more clear to the users that they aren't using beta
software anymore, since the last 10 or so releases have all been Alpha and
Beta releases.

Anyway, If this is the direction that has been decided, go for it.

Jonathan

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Thomas Dinges <blender at dingto.org> wrote:

> Big -1 for this,
> seriously let's not change the naming again!
> Ton and others decided on naming it 2.57 and 2.58 (Ton sent a mail with
> this in January to the ML). Let's stick to that!
>
> This is the n'th discussion about it on this list, and it starts to get
> annoying. ;-)
>
> Thomas
>
> Am 14.03.2011 11:02, schrieb Jonathan Smith:
>
> > I think this will also make more sense to developers, in that we have
> 2.60
> > as the base and we start working up and adding stuff from there,
> instead of
> > working from 2.58 up to 2.60 and having a bunch of new features in 2.60.
> >
> > Just my two cents,
> > Jonathan
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bf-committers mailing list
> > Bf-committers at blender.org
> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>