[Bf-committers] Cycles and Boost 1.44 (Fedora 14 and above)

[Brecht Van Lommel]

Hi,

I think this is about Cycles, Blender itself doesn't need boost. I
don't know if anyone has compiled Cycles on Fedora with that boost
version, but if you have a compile error related to boost it may be
there's a small code tweak necessary for that version. I'm using boost
1.46 here.

Brecht.

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Muhamad Faizol Abd. Halim
> <faizol.blender at gmail.com> wrote:
>> hi all,
>>
>>  has anyone been able to compile on Fedora 14 (with boost 1.44)?
>
> I assume you mean compile blender?
>
> I've had success building up to version 2.57b with reverse patches for
> Python 3.1 compatibility. Never worried about the boost version before
> but I guess version 1.44 would be correct.
>
> The source has changed enough for 2.58 that my reverse patches no
> longer apply properly and I haven't investigated whether it will be a
> simple fix or not.
>
> If you're interested in trying out my 2.57b package I can upload them
> somewhere...
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>