[Bf-committers] Proposal: Blender OpenCL compositor
Jeroen Bakker
j.bakker at atmind.nl
Fri Jan 21 08:37:10 CET 2011
On 01/21/2011 12:10 AM, Matt Ebb wrote:
> I say this not to be negative, but because there is a lot of room for
> functional improvement in blender's compositor, and if it is to be
> re-coded, it should be done with an eye to workflow and future
> abilities, not just from a purely techno-centric perspective.
I don't see it as negative. Also I don't think that I am (cap)able to
implement all these functional wishes/changes. They need to be thinked
about by users/developers together. I also don't think it is good to do
all this work we discussed in a single project. There will be a
separation of technology and functionality. First should concentrate in
implementing a kernel (stable ground), that is capable of our 'future'
wishes/changes/capabilities. And secondly we need to implement the more
functional/workflow part.
The first part needs to know the directions of the second part (vision).
This vision should be clear upfront, but not in details.
Jeroen
More information about the Bf-committers
mailing list