[Bf-committers] cycle todo list

[Aurel W.]

Hi,

before taking this too much off the ground, wouldn't it be better to
just stick to OpenCL right from the beginning?

I think if this is too much tightened to CUDA from the beginning, we
won't see an OpenCL port afterwards.

I haven't looked at the architecture of cycles yet and to which degree
it's implemented in CUDA, but when it is more, than just a simple
raytracing core, as it's done now in luxrender, it would be painful to
get OpenCL porting, after a lot of functionality is implemented.

aurel

On 28 April 2011 22:55, Dan Eicher <dan at trollwerks.org> wrote:
> Also...
>
> This boost-1.44 patch breaks the compile:
>
> https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/62245/trunk/boost/detail/sp_typeinfo.hpp
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>