[Bf-committers] A practical proposal for the task of re-licensing Blender

Alex Combas blenderwell at gmail.com
Thu Nov 25 04:07:23 CET 2010

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Martin Poirier <theeth at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I thought Ton was clear enough the first time, but apparently not, so let me reiterate:
> -----
> Based on feedback from key developers, the likelyhood there's a
> relicense to LGPL happing is near zero. Let's focus on ways to get end-
> user level useful extensions possible.
> -----
> Alex, please drop it. You're not helping your position with false dichotomies and misrepresentations.

Hello Martin,

If you had read my last comment before you made yours you would
have seen that I had already said "this will be my last reply on
this subject since I'm giving up on it" and so there was no need
for you say anything at all.

But I have to say "false dichotomies and misrepresentations" is
rude and uncalled for.

I don't think you were intending to be rude, so I'm just going to
forget about it, but I hope you don't usually treat people this way.

Making statements like that is what leads to flame wars and I'm
sure that nobody wants to see that.

All the best,

More information about the Bf-committers mailing list