watkinsig at gmail.com
Thu Jun 3 18:49:19 CEST 2010
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Nathan Letwory
<nathan at letworyinteractive.com> wrote:
> On 3.6.2010 18:46, Michael McLay wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Nathan Letwory<
>> nathan at letworyinteractive.com> wrote:
>>> On 3.6.2010 17:13, Ian Watkins wrote:> Lastly, have you guys used git at
>>> all? With the many branches you've
>>>> made for SOC, and the commit policy, I'd think you guys would love
>>>> distributed source code management -- along with the ability to merge
>>>> less painfully.
>>> No. I try to sync trunk to gitorious.org/blenderprojects though. And I
>>> don't think that a change of SCM will be done anytime soon. SVN has
>>> served us well enough and after a big CVS->SVN transition I don't think
>>> most of the users are longing for yet another one. Personally I'd like
>>> Git though.
>> I hope the Blender team is open to suggestions about how to improve the
>> project management activities. I agree with Ian that moving to a distribute
>> source code management tools has advantages. Merging is one of them. Another
>> is the ability to checkin to a branch when you are offline and then later
>> push the commits to the local copy of the branch back into the branch in a
>> central repository. The choice between Git, Bazaar, or Mercurial is a matter
>> of taste more than a matter of features.
>> A higher level discussion might also reconsider the choice of gforge. I
>> believe there is some disastifaction with gforge and alternatives have been
>> suggested. I don't recall the name. It wasn't Trac. I believe it was written
>> in Ruby. I wasn't reading the Blender mailing list when the decision was
>> made to move to gforge, but I would assume it may have been due to problems
>> with Sourceforge. That is a common reason for ditching Sourceforge. From a
>> project management perspective I would suggest considering a move to
>> Launchpad.net would. There are many advantages in migrating Blender to
> I worked on Redmine for a while, but got bogged hugely down by the
> workload at the previous job. Now that I am my own employer I think I'll
> recontinue this work if wanted so.
> There has earlier been talk about why not use an existing hosting and
> project management solution, and from the discussions I have gathered
> that it is in the end much more desireable to be in complete control of
> everything, with the risk that some resources go "to waste" by
> maintaining those (I'd say they go to a good cause, but that depends on
> your vantage point).
> Currently there's an effort under way to upgrade our ancient gforge
> installation to the latest version. This has been impeded due to
> problems with the servers though, but once those are solved I think that
> we'll see at least an updated and upgraded gforge installation, which
> hopefully alleviates the most pressing problem: the trackers.
> I guess we can have the discussion again after the integration (it's
> already in the pipeline, as said).
> About launchpad - I think I tried gaining maintainership of the Blender
> project there, but I have had no responses to my queries, so I lost
> interest in it (and after having used both Git and Bazaar I came to
> prefer Git after all, even though I was leaning towards Bazaar in the
> beginning) Anyway, as I already mentioned, I have a git repository
> mirrored on gitorious.org/blenderprojects, and can add users there that
> want write access to some repository, but not be in the so-called core
> team (people with write access to our svn repository).
1) Is there an automated nightly build? (e.g., BuildBot, hudson, etc)
If not, what would it take to get one set up? Actually, I think I
could do this myself -- but it would lack the ability to post good
output to a webserver. I could easily have email sent to this list if
2) Is there a code review tool instance? (i.e., review board,
crucible, reitvald, etc) If not, can one be set up?
More information about the Bf-committers