[Bf-committers] Module Owner List

[pete larabell]

Hey Thomas,

Sorry to bother you with silly questions, but do I add myself to the
ModuleOwners list on the wiki page, or does an official from BF do that?

Cheers,
Pete


On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:23 PM, pete larabell <xgl.asyliax at gmail.com>wrote:

> Yeah!
>
> I currently have both i386 and amd64 builds working, so when the word for
> 2.56 goes out, so long as I know what rev. to compile, I'd be more than
> happy to provide them.
>
> :) :) :)
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Thomas Dinges <blender at dingto.de> wrote:
>
>> Hey Pete,
>> sure there is no reason why we should not also have official FreeBSD
>> Releases!
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>> Am 28.12.2010 19:09, schrieb pete larabell:
>> > Hi Thomas,
>> >
>> > Just curious as to whether there is enough need (want) for FreeBSD
>> builds
>> > that you'd like someone to do official builds, or shall that just be
>> left to
>> > graphicall.org uploads?
>> >
>> > I built the 2.55 for FreeBSD i386 and amd64 architectures but didn't get
>> a
>> > response yet about 2.56 when I inquired about not seeing FreeBSD on the
>> list
>> > of platform builders being asked if they were ready/able to do 2.56.
>> >
>> > I checked the ModulesOwners to see if FreeBSD was listed on Release OSes
>> and
>> > it wasn't. If there is not enough need for it that's fine, I can just
>> post
>> > to graphicall, but I'm certainly willing and able to build for official
>> > releases too so long as I know in advance that I should be doing it.
>> >
>> > I know the unofficial title of FreeBSD build maintainer was sorta given
>> to
>> > Jaevixa McNomera after she started releasing builds in graphicall some
>> > months ago, and I offered to pick up the task when she was near fatally
>> > injured a couple months ago. I spoke with her about when she'd be back
>> and
>> > able to resume her role in building these, and her current projected
>> time is
>> > summer 2011 at the soonest.
>> >
>> > So basically, if you guys want a FreeBSD guy to do release builds, I'm
>> happy
>> > to do it. :)
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Pete
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Thomas Dinges<blender at dingto.de>
>>  wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hey everyone,
>> >> for the last few months it was quite unclear, especially for new
>> >> developers and patch-submitters who is responsible for a module. That
>> is
>> >> now finally solved.
>> >>
>> >> Ton has reviewed and approved a list, I have made about 1 year ago.
>> This
>> >> list was in the wiki and most of the current developers already took a
>> >> look at it, so it should be all fine.
>> >>
>> >> Mindrones made a template of it, so this list can be put into other
>> wiki
>> >> pages which is very useful.
>> >> http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Template:ModulesOwners
>> >>
>> >> It would be cool if everyone could take a look at it again and if there
>> >> is something wrong please answer to this mail here on the list.
>> >>
>> >> You can also checkout the guidelines on how to put this info on wiki
>> pages.
>> >> http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Template:ModulesOwners#Guidelines
>> >>
>> >> Thomas
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Bf-committers mailing list
>> >> Bf-committers at blender.org
>> >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Bf-committers mailing list
>> > Bf-committers at blender.org
>> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bf-committers mailing list
>> Bf-committers at blender.org
>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>>
>
>