[Bf-committers] RNA Rename Proposal

[Campbell Barton]

@Joshua, read how the flag is used and agree .is_path_absolute is
better, though this is not currently read-only, should it be made
read-only?

@Dan, functions need some review too, will do this after rna property renaming.

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Joshua Leung <aligorith at gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) KeyingSet.absolute -> use_path_absolute:   boolean  "Keying Set
> defines specific paths/settings to be keyframed (i.e. is not reliant
> on context info)"
>
> I don't really agree with this change. If I understand correctly, this
> implies that this setting is settable, which is isn't (or else all
> hell breaks loose). Perhaps "is_path_absolute" or similiar would be
> better if that's the case then?
>
> 2) Regarding KeyingSets again, just a friendly reminder that after
> renaming these properties to actually try inserting some keyframes
> using good-ol' IKEY.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Campbell Barton <ideasman42 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Here is a list of RNA properties to rename edited by Brecht, Luca and
>> myself (as mentioned last meeting).
>> The lines which are colored have been changed from there original
>> values, sorted by Class/attr.
>>
>> http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:Ideasman42/rna_rename
>>
>> Of 4605 names 1471 have changed, I'll need to write up some docs so
>> theres better guidelines for naming new RNA properties based on the
>> changes made here.
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>



-- 
- Campbell