[Bf-committers] Sunday meeting minutes, 27 sept 2009
iman1100 at gmail.com
Mon Sep 28 22:33:59 CEST 2009
Hey, my two cents on the 2.49c is that there shouldn't be an official
one. The people who would use it are probably more advanced and are
using it for stability or reliability, maybe studios. These are the
people who shouldn't have a problem compiling their own blender, and
maybe are doing so already.
On that note, if 2.5 will be beta releases, I think that 2.49 should
be made as stable as possible. If the 2.6 series continue for many
many months to follow, those who rely on stability, as mentioned
above, will probably stay with 2.49. Until the next official non-beta
release, 2.6, I think that the bug tracker should be kept open and
maintained for 2.9.
~Please feel free to dis-agree, Istvan.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Martin Poirier <theeth at yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- On Mon, 9/28/09, Ton Roosendaal <ton at blender.org> wrote:
>> 1) Current projects and 2.5x
> I'm also looking for more testers for network rendering.
> The features that need more testing are support for files with external dependencies (libs, textures, point cache works, no support for fluids yet) and the load balancer (submit many jobs with different priorities and see if it works like you'd think it should).
> Bug reports can be done on the 2.5 tracker, directly by email to me or on irc.
> Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
Knowledge is a measure of how many answers you have, intelligence is a
measure of how many questions you have.
"Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it
and a good education to appreciate it." - E. W. Dijkstra
"The price of humility doubles each time you have to buy it back" ~
"Intelligence is not enough. Intelligence plus character, that is the
goal of true education." ~ Martin Luther King, Jr.
"If everybody does it, it must be stupid" ~Ton Roosendaal
More information about the Bf-committers