[Bf-committers] While we're talking about naming conventions...

[Wahooney]

Layers make sense, it's use is very similar to layers in 2D paint 
software. And the other 3d software that uses the idea calls them that 
too, so you have a level of inter-program consistency.

If any changes should be made to layers it should be that we can have 
more of them and/or the ability to name them.

-1 to change name
+1 to add layer names
+1 to add more layers

malefico wrote:
> Agree
>
> -1 for renaming layers
>
> Cheers,
>
> malefico.
>
> jmsoler at free.fr wrote:
>   
>> -1 for renaming layers.
>>
>> Selon "Daniel Salazar - 3Developer.com" <zanqdo at gmail.com>:
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> You are kidding right? theres far more usages for Layers than related
>>> to rendering or visibility and shorten it to some meaningless RVG or
>>> what ever is a bad idea. Layers is layers in any 3D software out
>>> there.. nothing wrong with that name
>>>
>>> Daniel Salazar
>>> Cel: (506) 8366 8384
>>> Offi: (506) 2219 0511
>>> www.3developer.com
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> +1 for renaming layers. I think "visibility groups" is best, and
>>>> "render visibility groups" is fine for the render version. I'd be
>>>> happy to shorten this to VGs and RVGs or something like that if the
>>>> words themselves seem to long.
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bf-committers mailing list
>>> Bf-committers at blender.org
>>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bf-committers mailing list
>> Bf-committers at blender.org
>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>>
>>   
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>
>