[Bf-committers] Request for removing restrictions in edge rotation and face joining.

joe joeedh at gmail.com
Thu Mar 19 17:59:16 CET 2009


Could you send us a patch of what you did?

Joe

On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Banlu Kemiyatorn <object at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:55 AM, joe <joeedh at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hrm.  I'd file a bug report then.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Banlu Kemiyatorn <object at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 2:16 AM, joe <joeedh at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> There's a threshold for how coplanier the two triangles have to be,
>>>> this used to be too low by default, and it sounds like it perhaps
>>>> still is.
>>>>
>>>> Joe
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I think void join_triangles(void) only uses the threshold value for complex
> island and my cases it didn't but was rejected by a convex() test.
>
> I also have if(Inpf(face[0]->n,face[1]->n) <= 0.000001) in edge_rotate()
> commented didn't cause me any problem for a while.
>
> It is fine to live with that except that now I am teaching people about
> managing tris and edge loop to control sub-d and then I have to ask them
> to use my branch which I can't build a windows version for them. So I
> really wish
> these restrictions will be gone from 2.49. The only thing I am not certain
> is if these comments will cause any trouble to some existing batch processes.
> So I wonder if I can just have them commented of if a patch that allow an
> option to force the joining and the rotation is welcome.
>
> Thanks.
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>


More information about the Bf-committers mailing list