[Bf-committers] Render API follow-up

[Terrence Vergauwen]

Hi guys,

This is great news, i was thinking something along the same lines, wait till
2.5 RNA api is finalized, then start planning 'something' to start with.
I'm convinced this will get a great response from the artist community
aswell.

I'll start writing some documentation about various possibilities i need to
research with more detail asap,
when we've got our %99.99 ready v0.6 luxrender release out of the door
during the next week.

Thnx!,
Radiance



On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Ton Roosendaal <ton at blender.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> For many years we try to settle the render API topic, especially to
> allow advanced export and/or integration with third party renderers.
> For various reasons it remains getting postponed; mostly because the
> specs for such a system are complex and fuzzy.
>
> Before Wintercamp I was contacted by Terrence from Lux to at least give
> some roadmap or insight in how we like to proceed with rendering in
> Blender. Many developers out there are eagerly waiting for such
> clarity, and they are getting a bit tired or demotivated with our slow
> progress in this area. :)
> I've promised we would spend some time together during the Wintercamp
> workshop on this.
>
> We've discussed a couple of strategies; including a more 'high end'
> integration, not based on exporting geometry/materials but for example
> exposing an api to use raytrace calls and visibility info.
> However, what we quickly fell back to was the simple fact that we first
> should work on a good (re)design of how Blender will tackle rendering
> in general. This should start with a better way to define own shaders
> (real shader tree editor, shader language), but also a more advanced
> interal shading/lighting pipeline, and better methods to handle caching
> (geometry bucketing, image tiling, shadowbuffer tiling).
> This will, combined with the 2.5 flexibility to extend on Blenders data
> via RNA, deliver a much better starting point for a future proof design
> for integration (plugins) or export.
>
> So... not an easy answer! :) But I think it's fair for Blender to first
> fix their own  issues before moving to get better support for external
> renderers. That topic is really high on the prioriry list, and can get
> first priority when 2.5 is in a workable state, when we start up our
> next movie project for example.
>
> It's extremely tricky to pin me down on dates for this, but very likely
> work on rendering code comes back before july, with a working new
> architecture for this some months later (october?).
> Designs for an improved render system could start away though, and I'd
> be very interested to see what Terrence or others have in mind,
> especially how integration should ideally work from their perspective.
>
> -Ton-
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ton Roosendaal  Blender Foundation   ton at blender.org    www.blender.org
> Blender Institute BV  Entrepotdok 57A  1018AD Amsterdam The Netherlands
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-committers/attachments/20090309/b0ecdcc0/attachment.htm