[Bf-committers] How about adding boost uBLAS librarytoblender/extern?
ypoissant2 at videotron.ca
Mon Jan 26 15:34:03 CET 2009
From: "Shaul Kedem" <shaul.kedem at gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 9:08 AM
> - C++ is a superset of C, which means C++ can never be faster than C..
The reverse is also true.
> - Template based coding is hard to debug, sometimes impossible
> (believe me, when u see gdb crash it's not a pretty sight)
The fact that gdb crashes are ugly have little to do with template
debugging. I have debugged templates in MSVC and it was not more difficult
than debuging normal C or C++ code. At first, I feared that debugging
templates was as impossible to do as debugging large macros but it is just
not the case. Really, debugging templates proved as easy as debugging normal
C or C++ statement. You can trace them and watch values just as well.
> - C is simpler and compilers are better in optimizing C code
You would have to supply proofs of that. I have compared C vs C++ generated
assembly code side by side for the different segments of codes numerous
times and I would be incapable of reaching this conclusion.
> if I'll take Yves' argument and reverse it - there is no reason why we
> can't learn from eigen and code the same optimizations in C,
I invite you to read the refences I provided , understand the technique used
and think of how you could do that in C without using templates. The trick
is not any black art. The trick have been used for years in C as well as in
C++. It consist of hand parsing and coding every vector & matrix expressions
so they are optimized to generate as less temps as possible and inline. The
templates just do that for you.
More information about the Bf-committers