[Bf-committers] 2.49 proposal (continued)

Brecht Van Lommel brecht at blender.org
Wed Feb 25 15:04:54 CET 2009


Kent Mein wrote:
> In reply to Ton Roosendaal (ton at blender.org):
> Just a quick question on this, how should bugs be tackled?
> Lets assume there are three kinds of bugs.
> A.  Bug that applies to both blender 2.48 and current 2.5
> B.  Bug that applies to 2.48 not sure on 2.5
> C.  Bug that applies to 2.48 but not 2.5
> C is easy but we should have a process for A and or B.
> Should people be fixing A in both tree's or is someone looking at
> diffs of 2.48 to see if they apply to 2.5?
> I'm all for a 2.49 just don't want things to get lost.

I would prefer it if bugs are fixed in trunk, and then I can port them 
over to 2.5. It does mean some work, but doing merges when people are 
making changes to the same code in both branches is even more 
complicated in my experience. So, unless someone objects, just fix 
bugs in trunk only.


More information about the Bf-committers mailing list