[Bf-committers] 2.49 release proposal
jesterking at letwory.net
Tue Feb 17 21:49:52 CET 2009
I am also in favor of a 2.49 release. With all the pro's mentioned, I
have nothing to add really. For Windows release the BGE will have
increased performance too after my latest commit in trunk. It'd be
good if other platform maintainers could look into proper
corresponding flags/settings in the necessary SConscripts for this
2009/2/17 Dalai Felinto <dfelinto at gmail.com>:
> I also like the idea of a 2.49 release. Mainly for BGE goodies and a
> stable 2.4xx final build.
> Repeating arguments, it would be neat to see the released files of the
> BGE contest running flawlessly in Blender 2.50.
> >From my end, I'm pretty confident I can finish the BGE dome code for
> this timeframe (April) (I would need to finish it way earlier to get a
> proper feedback/review from others).
> And if Benoit says that the new API can be finished in time I think
> this strategy is really good (deprecating the old API in 2.49 and
> abandoning it in 2.50) - I can even help the team after we have the
> dome code committed.
> 2009/2/17 Amos Manneschmidt <amoose136 at gmail.com>:
>> I'm afraid that 2.49 will slow down 2.5 too much. It might be faster to add
>> the current features to 2.4x than to 2.5x but that will most likely slow
>> down the release of 2.5. I say take longer to release 2.5 in order to make
>> it more stable and forget the 2.49 release.
>> Bf-committers mailing list
>> Bf-committers at blender.org
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
More information about the Bf-committers