[Bf-committers] Meeting notes: 2.48 plans

Martin Poirier theeth at yahoo.com
Fri Sep 26 04:07:14 CEST 2008

--- On Thu, 9/25/08, Mathias Panzenböck <grosser.meister.morti at gmx.net> wrote:

> From: Mathias Panzenböck <grosser.meister.morti at gmx.net>
> Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] Meeting notes: 2.48 plans
> To: "bf-blender developers" <bf-committers at blender.org>
> Date: Thursday, September 25, 2008, 5:23 PM
> Roger Wickes schrieb:
> > I think if you just delete the pyc files, it forces
> Python to re-compile
> > (actually re-byte-code) the source...which is what the
> reload() does.
> > Perhaps these pyc should not be distributed or if they
> are not, people
> > may be copying over the source but not deleting the
> pyc modules, and
> > thus still have the old byte-code files being used.
> >  
> Maybe I don't understand something here, but if the
> time stamp of the pyc file
> is older than the one on the corresponding py file python
> recompiles the source.
> Or does this work different when you use python as
> extension language?

We're talking about py files included in the Blender files, there's no pyc files being generated, only internally compiled (without time stamp). It does work ok when not running them in the GE, so there's definitely something wrong there particularly.



More information about the Bf-committers mailing list