[Bf-committers] WITH_OPENEXR required in file that defines it afterwards?
cwant at ualberta.ca
Mon Dec 15 22:07:30 CET 2008
Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote:
> Well, I was just curious to know how to contribute and the policies.
> Basically, I was looking at the complexity of the blender code and
> interdependencies. I think that CMake 2.6 brings a lot of features in
> the lines of target dependent properties, functions for scoping, etc.
> But I don't have concrete cases at hand or experience with the build
> process, so I don't think this discussion is worth our time for now.
> In the future, I might bring this up again if there is in fact a
> compelling reason.
Yeah, we've already had a few issues come up due to this policy
stuff in 2.6. See for example:
To be honest, I haven't researched the subject much.
More information about the Bf-committers