[Bf-committers] displist.c, surfaces and buffers

[Joe Eagar]

Emmanuel Stone wrote:
> On 11/19/07, Joe Eagar <joeedh at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> I don't think the data is cached anywhere;
>>     
>
> That's what I was afraid of.
>
> Is it a good idea to try to cache this data?
> The size of a tesselation buffer is often static for common operations.
> Reusing this buffer should offer a performance increase.
>
> As long as the current system isn't a deliberate design choice, I will
> look into changing this behaviour in my branch.
>
> -Emmanuel
>   

You could try caching it, yes.  Perhaps put it inside the Curve struct.

Joe