[Bf-committers] SVN restructure

Joe Eagar joeedh at gmail.com
Fri Jun 1 18:29:58 CEST 2007


jonathan ferguson wrote:
> Although I don't really have a better solution, I comment that this  
> has the unfortunate side-effect of breaking the expected workflow of
>
> cd bf-blender/trunk/
> svn update
>
> and having *all* of the relevant files including the lib tree,  
> updated. Improperly updated lib trees can cost quite a bit of time  
> when building blender suddenly breaks (and you have no idea why  
> because code that depended on libxyz0.1 has changed to depend on  
> libxyz0.2 or some such thing and you haven't been reading every Bf- 
> blender-svn message).
>
> Then the workflow for "day-to-day" updates is really:
>
> cd bf-blender/trunk/
> svn update
> cd bf-blender/lib
> svn update
>   
I have *never* had troubles with not updating lib.  Mostly this is 
because the (4 or so) times it's been updated for windows I've seen the 
commit logs :)  Lib just simply isn't updated very often at all, so 
theres not much point in updating it every day.

Joe


More information about the Bf-committers mailing list