[Bf-committers] SVN restructure
Joe Eagar
joeedh at gmail.com
Fri Jun 1 18:29:58 CEST 2007
jonathan ferguson wrote:
> Although I don't really have a better solution, I comment that this
> has the unfortunate side-effect of breaking the expected workflow of
>
> cd bf-blender/trunk/
> svn update
>
> and having *all* of the relevant files including the lib tree,
> updated. Improperly updated lib trees can cost quite a bit of time
> when building blender suddenly breaks (and you have no idea why
> because code that depended on libxyz0.1 has changed to depend on
> libxyz0.2 or some such thing and you haven't been reading every Bf-
> blender-svn message).
>
> Then the workflow for "day-to-day" updates is really:
>
> cd bf-blender/trunk/
> svn update
> cd bf-blender/lib
> svn update
>
I have *never* had troubles with not updating lib. Mostly this is
because the (4 or so) times it's been updated for windows I've seen the
commit logs :) Lib just simply isn't updated very often at all, so
theres not much point in updating it every day.
Joe
More information about the Bf-committers
mailing list