[Bf-committers] B-Con 3?

[Kent Mein]

In reply to Chris Want (cwant at ualberta.ca):

> So, my question would be: should the documentation be updated to be more
> lenient towards new features during B-Con 3, should we revise our release
> level to B-Con 2, or should CVS really be in 'feature freeze'? Either of
> these outcomes would be fine be me, as long as documentation and reality
> are more closely in sync.
> 
> As discussed at the meeting, I would also recommend that when we
> change B-Con levels, that this mailing list is notified in a message
> that includes a repost of the description of the B-Con level.

It should be Frozen...  I think the emailing the list is a good idea
for the future.  I think Ton's mia status is why no one has really
complained but your right we need to shape the newbies up ;)

Kent
-- 
mein at cs.umn.edu
http://www.cs.umn.edu/~mein