[Bf-committers] how complete should translations be before inclusion?

[Ewout Fernhout]

Yes, I too think that if filesize is going to be a problem, then a
language pack is the way to go. That way it's much easier for non-tech
users to update the files, because they don't have to compile the po
files into mo. AND you don't need to include all the possible
languages in the standard distribution.
I don't know about things like rosetta though.

Ewout

On 9/8/06, Drip Stone <wisitvenita at gmail.com> wrote:
> hi, LetterRip
>
> I think the advantage of using XML for translating is that we don't need to
> compile those files again, and people can modify them according to their
> customs(after blender is compiled).
>
>
>  On 9/6/06, Tom M <letterrip at gmail.com> wrote:
> > .po files are text, percentage complete is already calculated by
> > rosetta, the question is what state of partial completion is
> > sufficient to warrant inclusion,
> >
> > LetterRip
> >
> > On 9/5/06, Drip Stone < wisitvenita at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > Should we consider another format as xml? People can modify the
> translation
> > > files easily enough when they wish or need to do so. Also, the
> percentage of
> > > translation can be calculated by writing a relevant
> > > program.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bf-committers mailing list
> > Bf-committers at projects.blender.org
> >
> http://projects.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at projects.blender.org
> http://projects.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>
>
>