[Bf-committers] Image Editor Mess

bjornmose bjornmose at gmx.net
Thu Feb 2 00:34:25 CET 2006

Please, stay on topic ( .. untangeling the UI mess .. )
I did not think of blowing up the image editor any further. Photoshop, 
Gimp ... can do things far better than we can try to copy. And if verse 
<-> blender  works for Gimp we could even nuke that minimalistc 2d 
painting set (though  it may be usefull for some 'quickies')

Joe Eagar wrote:
> bjornmose wrote:
>> Hi, all
>> I know we are in a transition mode, but the UV/image editor is in a 
>> very bad state right now.
>> So i'd like to pick up the occasion to make decicions how to proceed.
>> The UV/image space now is used for 3 tasks.
>> 1. Editing UVs and having the (texture) image shown.
>> 2. Editing the image with a minimalistic 2d painting tool.
> Python functions for applying fast brushes to an image would be nice.  A 
> simple way to load a brush image (with alpha) and apply it to the image 
> is what I guess I'm saying.  Thus, a better image editor could be 
> implemented in python.  This could be done with the current 
> implementation, but the Image module only provides simple per-pixel 
> color access, which isn't the fastest way of doing things, even in C.
> Just an idea.
> joeedh
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at projects.blender.org
> http://projects.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers

More information about the Bf-committers mailing list