[Bf-committers] Re: [Bf-blender-cvs] CVS commit:
blender/source/blender/python/api2_2x vector.c
Daniel Dunbar
evilzr at yahoo.com
Tue Sep 27 04:40:58 CEST 2005
My intuition says this is a bad idea. You can
reliably sort vectors for one thing. Also
embedding an epsilon inside a class is really
a bad idea in my opinion.
This seems like abuse of operator overloading for
a not particularly often used special case.
--- Joseph Gilbert <models at paposo.com> wrote:
> ascotan (Joseph Gilbert) 2005/09/26 22:11:13 CEST
>
> Modified files:
> blender/source/blender/python/api2_2x vector.c
>
> Log:
> - added some equivalency testing for vector classes
> >, >=, <, <= test vector magnitude
> ==, != test vector values 'within epsilon' :)
> - inspired by ideasman
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.32 +155 -14 blender/source/blender/python/api2_2x/vector.c
>
>
<http://projects.blender.org/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/blender/source/blender/python/api2_2x/vector.c.diff?r1=1.31&r2=1.32&cvsroot=bf-blender>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-blender-cvs mailing list
> Bf-blender-cvs at projects.blender.org
> http://projects.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-blender-cvs
>
daniel dunbar
More information about the Bf-committers
mailing list