[Bf-committers] Re: [Bf-blender-cvs] CVS commit: blender/source/blender/python/api2_2x vector.c

Daniel Dunbar evilzr at yahoo.com
Tue Sep 27 04:40:58 CEST 2005


My intuition says this is a bad idea. You can
reliably sort vectors for one thing. Also
embedding an epsilon inside a class is really
a bad idea in my opinion. 

This seems like abuse of operator overloading for
a not particularly often used special case.

--- Joseph Gilbert <models at paposo.com> wrote:

> ascotan (Joseph Gilbert) 2005/09/26 22:11:13 CEST
> 
>   Modified files:
>     blender/source/blender/python/api2_2x vector.c 
>   
>   Log:
>   - added some equivalency testing for vector classes
>   >, >=, <, <= test vector magnitude
>   ==, != test vector values 'within epsilon' :)
>   - inspired by ideasman
>   
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.32      +155 -14   blender/source/blender/python/api2_2x/vector.c
>    
>
<http://projects.blender.org/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/blender/source/blender/python/api2_2x/vector.c.diff?r1=1.31&r2=1.32&cvsroot=bf-blender>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-blender-cvs mailing list
> Bf-blender-cvs at projects.blender.org
> http://projects.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-blender-cvs
> 


daniel dunbar


More information about the Bf-committers mailing list