[Bf-committers] UV Editor Rewrite

[Bart]

What really is missing for the UV Editor is better support for Subsurf:
http://www.neeneenee.de/blender/features/#23

See additional ideas:
http://www.neeneenee.de/blender/features/#5

Ton Roosendaal wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> For the time being; just do not support UV (TFace). We can live with a  
> HEmesh as primitive like curve/surface/mball, which also doesnt support  
> UV texture.
> HEmesh is for modeling pleasure first, concentrate on that. And make a  
> good ALT+C convert option for downgrading it to normal Mesh.
> 
> Brecht here is 'owner' of the UV editor and features. I know he was  
> already looking into a more flexible design in Blender, also for  
> multiple layers of UV textures.
> 
> A next step then could be a generic UV texture system for all current  
> primitive types...
> 
> -Ton-
> 
> 
> On 22 Mar, 2005, at 4:19, joeedh wrote:
> 
>> Hi.  As far as I can tell, adding UV support to HEMesh will require a  
>> full rewrite of the UV image editing window.
>>
>> I've posted some ideas for this on  
>> http://wiki.blender.org/bin/view.pl/Blenderdev/WebHome .  I don't  
>> really want to do this right now, so I'm just posting some ideas.
>>
>> Sounds a little time-consuming and boring, rewriting the image 
>> editing  window. . .*sigh* perhaps I'll just use python. . .
>>
>> joeedh
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bf-committers mailing list
>> Bf-committers at projects.blender.org
>> http://projects.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --
> Ton Roosendaal  Blender Foundation ton at blender.org  http://www.blender.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at projects.blender.org
> http://projects.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>