[Bf-committers] Cheap Tweak Mode
K. Richard Rhodes
krich at frontiernet.net
Sun Jan 16 00:07:48 CET 2005
It's just that i never really see much from tuhopuu make it into bf
(quick example, the way the lamps look in tuhopuu is great)
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 20:34 +1100, Jonathan Merritt wrote:
> Well, I can think of two possible reasons to go via tuhopuu:
> 1. It allows non-programmers to test and use the patch in a full build.
> Even though it's simple, it is somewhat experimental - is there any
> other "quick/implicit mode switch" like this in Blender? Regardless, it
> allows more people to test it in real-world situations and answer
> Chris's question about whether or not this is desirable. The testing
> and migration to the main codebase can surely be done prior to the next
> 2. Chris does most (if not all!) of the work for tuhopuu merges, for
> which all tuhopuu people are eternally grateful! :-) If anyone can
> manage a test period in tuhopuu prior to migrating to the main codebase
> then surely it's him! :-) Personally, I think that more stuff should go
> through tuhopuu first. While committing something like this directly
> into the main codebase doesn't necessarily undermine tuhopuu, surely
> going via tuhopuu with as many new features as possible will not do it
> any harm. It may even be helpful for the morale of less-experienced
> developers to have more tuhopuu success stories.
> Jonathan Merritt.
> >looking at the code and testing the patch, ummm... it works and isn't
> >too intrusive. why go through tuhopuu for it ?
> >On Jan 15, 2005, at 1:14 AM, Chris Want wrote:
> >>>Anyways, I guess the
> >>>question is: is this a desirable behavior?
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at projects.blender.org
More information about the Bf-committers