[Bf-committers] release...!
John K. Walton
bf-committers@blender.org
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:13:15 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Ton Roosendaal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apart from a UI discussion, and review of Michels paper, we spent most
> time yesterday on discussing the pros and cons of doing a 2.29.
>
> Planning a full release now is something everyone had doubts about. We
> agreed to work with clear targets for a release, and although they were
> mapped out, it doesn't look like we can finish all of that very soon.
> Reasonable would be to expect 2-3 weeks for it.
> That makes it come to close to the projected 2.3 deadline, end of
> october.
>
> Another topic is that I want to start committing new UI stuff really
> soon. This is something more people have to work at, better to start
> with that next week.
>
> Here's what we've agreed on now:
>
> - we don't make an official 2.29, but compile a snapshot. We can just
> call it 'upgrade' or 2.28c. It will become available for test at
> download.blender.org, and announced at the forums and an article.
> - I will look work with intrr to get his envmap patch committed, I have
> the code here already
> - Apart from this, and from major bugs people need to commit, CVS is
> frozen now.
> - I aim at tomorrow for committing the envmap code. Then the platform
> managers can checkout and compile a binary
> - when all binaries are ready (thursday?), CVS is open again for all
> projects as described in the roadmap for 2.30.
>
> Platform managers; please verify if this is possible?
i can compile from work, shouldn't be a problem, latest commit compiles ok
on IRIX.
> Thanks!
>
> -Ton-
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation ton@blender.org
> http://www.blender.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers@blender.org
> http://www.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>