[Bf-committers] release...!

John K. Walton bf-committers@blender.org
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:13:15 -0400 (EDT)


On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Ton Roosendaal wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Apart from a UI discussion, and review of Michels paper, we spent most  
> time yesterday on discussing the pros and cons of doing a 2.29.
> 
> Planning a full release now is something everyone had doubts about. We  
> agreed to work with clear targets for a release, and although they were  
> mapped out, it doesn't look like we can finish all of that very soon.  
> Reasonable would be to expect 2-3 weeks for it.
> That makes it come to close to the projected 2.3 deadline, end of  
> october.
> 
> Another topic is that I want to start committing new UI stuff really  
> soon. This is something more people have to work at, better to start  
> with that next week.
> 
> Here's what we've agreed on now:
> 
> - we don't make an official 2.29, but compile a snapshot. We can just  
> call it 'upgrade' or 2.28c. It will become available for test at  
> download.blender.org, and announced at the forums and an article.
> - I will look work with intrr to get his envmap patch committed, I have  
> the code here already
> - Apart from this, and from major bugs people need to commit, CVS is  
> frozen now.
> - I aim at tomorrow for committing the envmap code. Then the platform  
> managers can checkout and compile a binary
> - when all binaries are ready (thursday?), CVS is open again for all  
> projects as described in the roadmap for 2.30.
> 
> Platform managers; please verify if this is possible?

i can compile from work, shouldn't be a problem, latest commit compiles ok
on IRIX.
 
> Thanks!
> 
> -Ton-
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> --
> Ton Roosendaal  Blender Foundation ton@blender.org  
> http://www.blender.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers@blender.org
> http://www.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>