I could be wrong here, but 10.3 should be capable of running applications compiled for OS X on 10.2. If not, who would want to go to the new OS? It has to be backwards compatible with 10.2, at least! On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, car wrote: > I think that it has to be compiled with 10.3 . I don't know. And I do > not have a chance yet to start that long process .