[Bf-committers] License for the binary distro

Alistair Riddoch bf-committers@blender.org
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 20:35:56 +0000


--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 05:06:55PM +0100, Arne Schmitz wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>=20
> Am Samstag, 8. Februar 2003 18:42 schrieb Alistair Riddoch:
> > I have read over the license carefully, and I agree with Max's
> > analysis. You do need to provide a copy of the GPL with the binary,
> > though the user is not required to agree to the license if they
> > just want to run the software.
>=20
> I also agree with the analysis of you and Max. But maybe it would also be=
 wise=20
> to write an email to the FSF to clear things up? I mean, they've got lawy=
ers=20
> and everything and should be able to give some advice.
>=20

I have contacted Dave Turner, the FSF license engineer, informally about
this as he is a member of the WorldForge online community, and he
has confirmed that the wording of the license previously described
in this thread does mean that a copy of the GPL must be included with
a binary distribution.

Al
--=20
Alistair Riddoch
alriddoch@zepler.org
http://zepler.org/~alriddoch/

--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE+SA0smpFnJxPk53QRAn4pAJ9hEpEnoDBbgL5kus+LRdtIDuNwTgCgwMmx
m61wZx9HxqGHz6YqD/5aVl0=
=+6+Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gKMricLos+KVdGMg--