> Ah, I had not been following this thread. Has someone figured out why > Blender will build with gcc 2.95 but not 3.2? Yes, but I don't think "C++ is the tool of Satan" is a proper explanation! ;) If nobody comes up with a fix for this today I'll revert it tomorrow (certainly if somebody is absolutely itching to revert it today, they are welcome to do so). Regards, Chris