[Bf-blender-cvs] [99cbaced3bf] master: Fix: Incorrect field status in offset point in curve node
Hans Goudey
noreply at git.blender.org
Mon Oct 3 23:46:05 CEST 2022
Commit: 99cbaced3bfcc98a0ecf4e20ebb3b12bba24a342
Author: Hans Goudey
Date: Mon Oct 3 16:44:09 2022 -0500
Branches: master
https://developer.blender.org/rB99cbaced3bfcc98a0ecf4e20ebb3b12bba24a342
Fix: Incorrect field status in offset point in curve node
The input supports fields, the outputs are fields only if either of the
inputs are fields. Also, .hide_value() is redundant for implicit fields.
===================================================================
M source/blender/nodes/geometry/nodes/node_geo_offset_point_in_curve.cc
===================================================================
diff --git a/source/blender/nodes/geometry/nodes/node_geo_offset_point_in_curve.cc b/source/blender/nodes/geometry/nodes/node_geo_offset_point_in_curve.cc
index 6891593d6f7..d71e27e0385 100644
--- a/source/blender/nodes/geometry/nodes/node_geo_offset_point_in_curve.cc
+++ b/source/blender/nodes/geometry/nodes/node_geo_offset_point_in_curve.cc
@@ -28,18 +28,17 @@ static void node_declare(NodeDeclarationBuilder &b)
{
b.add_input<decl::Int>(N_("Point Index"))
.implicit_field(implicit_field_inputs::index)
- .hide_value()
.description(
N_("The index of the control point to evaluate. Defaults to the current index"));
b.add_input<decl::Int>(N_("Offset"))
- .dependent_field()
+ .supports_field()
.description(N_("The number of control points along the curve to traverse"));
b.add_output<decl::Bool>(N_("Is Valid Offset"))
- .field_source()
+ .dependent_field()
.description(N_("Outputs true if the evaluated control point plus the offset "
"is a valid index of the original curve"));
b.add_output<decl::Int>(N_("Point Index"))
- .field_source()
+ .dependent_field()
.description(N_("The index of the control point plus the offset within the entire "
"curves data-block"));
}
More information about the Bf-blender-cvs
mailing list