thats just an n-gon if I'm not mistaken, its a matter of better n-gon tesselation, not fixing the bevel itself... right? :)<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/29/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Chris Want</b> <
<a href="mailto:cwant@ualberta.ca">cwant@ualberta.ca</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Levi Schooley wrote:
<br>> 3. I coded a basic bevel modifier. You can see the results here:<br>> <a href="http://hhofministries.org/images/bevel_screen1.png">http://hhofministries.org/images/bevel_screen1.png</a><br>> <a href="http://hhofministries.org/images/bevel_screen2.png">
http://hhofministries.org/images/bevel_screen2.png</a><br><br>Hey Levi, that looks pretty good! (The effect of the bevel at<br>vertices in the concave parts might need a little work though).<br><br>Chris<br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>Soc-2007-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Soc-2007-dev@blender.org">Soc-2007-dev@blender.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/soc-2007-dev">http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/soc-2007-dev
</a><br></blockquote></div><br>