<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Hmmm,<br>
<br>
ok - checked out the latest src, seemed to compile, then I got the
following error:<br>
<br>
source/blender/blenkernel/intern/node.c:31:20: Fehler: Python.h: No
such file or directory<br>
scons: ***
[/home/fl0/BlenderITASK/build/linux2/source/blender/blenkernel/intern/node.o]
Error 1<br>
scons: building terminated because of errors.<br>
<br>
I've used the following commands as described in the Blender wiki, I
although installed all deps:<br>
<br>
</font>
<pre><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">cd ~ ; \
mkdir blender-svn ; \
cd blender-svn ; \
svn checkout <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://svn.blender.org/svnroot/bf-blender/trunk/blender">https://svn.blender.org/svnroot/bf-blender/trunk/blender</a> blender; \
cd blender; \
echo "BF_OPENAL_LIB = 'openal alut'" > user-config.py; \
python scons/scons.py;
<big>Is there any other approach?
Second question:
Benoit said that I won't be possible to use the gameEngine and compute the
joint angles ... BUT what about the way I'm doing it now - just move the robots'
model in the 3D view and run a script?
Thanks in advance - Florian</big></font>
</pre>
<br>
<br>
Florian Lier wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:2622_1249068262_ZZg0B1b44STz4.00_4A7344E6.9020606@icram.de"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hey,
nice work Benoit ... I'll test my robot modell too - as soon as I can
build 2.5 on my machine.
Got some weird compile errors too ... I'll try the svn update.
I added the video!
Cheers, Florian
Benoit Bolsee wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi,
I received from the KUL a nice robot model and I tested it with iTaSC.
You can see the result here: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://vimeo.com/5857397">http://vimeo.com/5857397</a>
It allowed me to test the performance of iTaSC compared to the old
solver. The difference is amazing! iTaSC is able to operate this robot
in real time at 25 fps using 10% of one CPU core (E8400 @ 3GHz). This
percentage does not include the time spent on graphic (4%). In this test
iTaSC computes 100 iterations per second.
The exact same test but using the old solver uses 99% of one CPU core
and runs at 4.4fps. This means that iTaSC is about 56 times faster than
the old solver and produces much more coherent results. This is without
SSE optimization (significant performance gain can be expected from
Eigen2 template library when SSE optimizations are enabled).
When I enable the auto step algorithm, the performance doubles but the
movements are slightly less stable.
The iTaSC algorithm is available in the itasc branch (based on blender
2.5) and tests builds are available at graphicall.org
Regards,
Benoit
P.S. Florian, can you add this video to the Blender and Robotics group
in Vimeo. I couldn't find how to do it.
_______________________________________________
Robotics mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Robotics@blender.org">Robotics@blender.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/robotics">http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/robotics</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
_______________________________________________
Robotics mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Robotics@blender.org">Robotics@blender.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/robotics">http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/robotics</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>