<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif;font-size:small">Yeah the design is more general. Because the issue is the same for stereo, depth reconstruction, witness support and so on. Blender UI in MCE is not quite ready for that, or in a painful way</div>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2013/10/1 david j <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:davidj@gmail.com" target="_blank">davidj@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">Here is a video of doing multi-camera tracking in another popular tool, for reference... In this example they had a stereoscopic camera, so the views are pretty similar, but the UI concepts are the same. <div>
<br></div><div><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jfgd3IyfK5Q&feature=player_detailpage#t=216" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jfgd3IyfK5Q&feature=player_detailpage#t=216</a><br></div><div><br>
</div><div>While you are in there dealing with UI for correspondence, if you have time, it would be nice if there was a way to setup a persistant and visualized correspondence between specific trackers and the reconstruction orientation paramaters (floor, wall, origin, scale, etc, etc).. Currently they have to be redone every time you run reconstruction, which in my more iterative use of the tool was a pain.. </div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Bf-vfx mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Bf-vfx@blender.org">Bf-vfx@blender.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-vfx" target="_blank">http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-vfx</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>____________________<br>François Tarlier<br><a href="http://www.francois-tarlier.com">www.francois-tarlier.com</a><br><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/francoistarlier">www.linkedin.com/in/francoistarlier</a>
</div>