<font size="2"><font face="trebuchet ms,sans-serif"><br></font></font><br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/10/20 Ejner Fergo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ejnersan@gmail.com">ejnersan@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Ok ok, I get what you mean, relax. You are right that the sensor_width<br>
is constant, but what Brecht asked is why the width ACTS like the<br>
height, as in the primary horizontal value is now a vertical fov, but<br>
this is not apparent in the interface. Forget that the camera is<br>
rotated, this will not export correctly.<br>
<br>
About presets, I still can't see why the presets can't be shared.<br></blockquote><div><br>not that they can't be shared accross all B's space, IMO it should, but Sergey told me it was problematic. but having camera preset and lens preset seperated does not make much sense, since a camera is all about sensor, and this data is needed in the lens profile<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<font color="#888888"><br>
/Ejner<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:38 PM, François T. <<a href="mailto:francoistarlier@gmail.com">francoistarlier@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>><br>
>> That the sensor_width becomes sensor_height in portrait, is as<br>
>> Francois writes,<br>
><br>
> NO ! I was actually saying that the sensor width NEVER becomes the sensor<br>
> height. portrait mode is a rotation of the camera itself. You should never<br>
> intervert those parameter<br>
><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> I just saw that the tracking camera presets have more data. Personally<br>
>> I would prefer that there was only one shared camera preset, and the<br>
>> extra data (except lens info) seems negligible to have in a preset<br>
>> IMHO, or at least it could still be shared. Having lens data as<br>
>> presets themselves makes much more sense.<br>
><br>
> not quite, because the lens profile depends on the filmgate. the profile<br>
> won't be different for a same lens with different filmgate<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div><div><div></div><div class="h5">> _______________________________________________<br>
> Bf-vfx mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Bf-vfx@blender.org">Bf-vfx@blender.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-vfx" target="_blank">http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-vfx</a><br>
><br>
><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bf-vfx mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Bf-vfx@blender.org">Bf-vfx@blender.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-vfx" target="_blank">http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-vfx</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>____________________<br>François Tarlier<br><a href="http://www.francois-tarlier.com">www.francois-tarlier.com</a><br><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/francoistarlier">www.linkedin.com/in/francoistarlier</a><br>