<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
That the sensor_width becomes sensor_height in portrait, is as<br>
Francois writes,</blockquote><div><br>NO ! I was actually saying that the sensor width NEVER becomes the sensor height. portrait mode is a rotation of the camera itself. You should never intervert those parameter<br><br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im"><br>
<br>
</div>I just saw that the tracking camera presets have more data. Personally<br>
I would prefer that there was only one shared camera preset, and the<br>
extra data (except lens info) seems negligible to have in a preset<br>
IMHO, or at least it could still be shared. Having lens data as<br>
presets themselves makes much more sense.<br></blockquote><div><br>not quite, because the lens profile depends on the filmgate. the profile won't be different for a same lens with different filmgate<br><br> <br></div>
</div>