Regarding point 10. I understand there is some kind of technical difficulty Bastien explained (that I don´t fully understand, to be honest :) but I just want to stress it´s a really annoying mistranslation that we have now.<br>
It just looks as if translated with Google. :-/<br><br>I´ll be more than happy when it´s resolved (either if it is a hack) ;)<br><br>cheers!<br>g<br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2013/2/15 Bastien Montagne <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:montagne29@wanadoo.fr" target="_blank">montagne29@wanadoo.fr</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
8, 9: I really, really agree with you - but those are far less easy
to handle (the node-related frame I will anyway wait for lukas'
pynodes)... I will keep them on hold for now. :/<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
Bastien<div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On 15/02/2013 14:58, - LEON - wrote:
</div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="h5">
<div dir="ltr">10. I really really really think the word refering to Node
type "Frame" should be separated from the rest, since this one
actually means a Pallet-like thing to hold other nodes, not
referring to the same "frame" in Animation!
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks a lot for your further concern!</div>
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
Leon Cheung
<div>a.k.a. 老猫</div>
</div>
</div><br></div></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div><br>