<div dir="ltr">I guess that it is so much to say that the thing is already planned. I have only read an idea: "reuse as much code as possible from blender" but i don't think this will be feasible for all the systems (renderer, animations, physics, etc) due to the different nature of real time / non real time approaches. One thing is to know the path and other thing is to walk by this path :-)</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-02-01 22:10 GMT+01:00 pgi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pierluigi@tukano.it" target="_blank">pierluigi@tukano.it</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Thank you for the answer.<br>
<br>
Well, if the thing is already planned (and I mean it will happen,
just we're not sure when) then the entire process I propose is
unnecessary. It will be done anyway, just in the right way from the
start - instead of discussing here a design that may or may not
survive the later integration.<br>
Let's be clear, I'm more than happy with that, the more I look at
the code the more I say to myself "you're gonna be in deep
troubles..." :D.<div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 01/02/2015 21:47, Sybren A. Stüvel
wrote:<br>
</div>
</div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="h5">
<pre>On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 09:06:10PM +0100, pgi wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>I'd like to have some feedback, resoucers or articles to check for,
ideas and and (mandatory) agreement on the new layout of the engine.
Or a slap in the face, I might very well be wrong on my assumption
that the current design is a mess. But I could point out that it has
been probably a data driven design because I see the logic of it and
its typical problems.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre>>From my point of view, it is hard to give feedback on your ideas. I
think your overall idea is good. However, it is written in such
generic terms that it's hard to disagree with.
I think that unification between Blender and BGE is one of the aspects
where we can really improve the BGE. This would cover the viewport,
mesh data, materials, physics, etc. Unification would also mean that
there is less (or no) need for an asset manager any more, no separate
renderer, etc.
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
</div></div><span class=""><pre>_______________________________________________
Bf-gamedev mailing list
<a href="mailto:Bf-gamedev@blender.org" target="_blank">Bf-gamedev@blender.org</a>
<a href="http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-gamedev" target="_blank">http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-gamedev</a>
</pre>
</span></blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Bf-gamedev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Bf-gamedev@blender.org">Bf-gamedev@blender.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-gamedev" target="_blank">http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-gamedev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>