<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">I don't know about Ton, but Brecht
usually documents whatever he's working on as he codes it so I'd
imagine he's aware of the general lack of activity.<br>
<br>
-Fade<br>
<br>
On 09/01/12 16:05, Robert wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5041A5B1.6090005@gmail.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Has Ton, Brecht, or one of the main
developers seen this problem yet? <br>
-Robert <br>
On 9/1/2012 10:19 AM, <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:fade_docboard_blender@ymail.com">fade_docboard_blender@ymail.com</a>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:50422794.8040500@ymail.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">I know what you mean, I've got
nearly 20 pages linked in the task list (<a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Meta:Wiki_Tasks/Review_2.6_Manual">http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Meta:Wiki_Tasks/Review_2.6_Manual</a>)
and again on my user page that haven't been reviewed. Some of
these have been sitting there since the start of February.
Waiting 7 months for a review has all but killed my interest
in contributing. I'm also going to be *that guy* and say that
I called it (<a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-docboard/2012-February/003861.html">http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-docboard/2012-February/003861.html</a>).<br>
<br>
I know that there was a lot of effort put into setting up this
review process but it hasn't worked and doesn't look like it's
going to. There simply aren't enough people with enough time
to make this system work properly. <br>
<br>
Keeping the task list is useful, but I'm inclined to think
that it's time to ditch the whole review thing. At this point,
it's just holding up improvements to the manual. I know that
it was put in place for quality control, but it's had the
opposite effect since none of the contributions are making it
into the manual and we're still left with the incorrect and
outdated pages. <br>
<br>
The review system is just placing obstacles in front of
current and potential contributors and I'd rather run the risk
of some lower quality pages so that it's easier for people to
contribute. <br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
Fade<br>
<br>
On 08/28/12 01:20, Sascha wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:503B9042.6000008@gmail.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
I had posted updates for the strands, build modifier, particle
mode, and bake pages over 4 months ago, but they still haven't
been reviewed<br>
I've really lost all momentum on wiki editing after this much
time waiting for a proof-read<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:Sascha_Uncia/Doc:2.6/Manual/Materials/Properties/Strands">http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:Sascha_Uncia/Doc:2.6/Manual/Materials/Properties/Strands</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:Sascha_Uncia/Doc:2.6/Manual/Physics/Particles/Mode">http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:Sascha_Uncia/Doc:2.6/Manual/Physics/Particles/Mode</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>